In a message dated 11/16/1999 1:03:02 PM EST, jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
> You're ranting (but entertainingly). This may bore you, but the OM2000 is
> none of these things. I can use it alongside my OM-2S and OM-4T with
> complete confidence that the results will be indistinguishable.
I have to heartily second Joel's take on the OM2000. It is by no means even
close to "crappy". It takes excellent photos. Period. True, it's not a $1500
OM-3T, but it IS one heckuva value for it's cost, IMO. Don't knock the fact
that most people wouldn't have it repaired if it broke, I don't think many
$150 cameras are worth repairing unless they're un-replaceable or hold
sentimental value.
Regards,
George S.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|