Subject: | Re: [OM] filters, again. |
---|---|
From: | "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 1 Nov 1999 08:54:21 -0800 |
===Adding a filter *does* affect image quality no matter what its purpose is (dispersion, transmission loss and possibly flare); it's a matter of how much and whether it will be noticed in the end product.==== You are right about the filter affecting image. I prefer to use a polarizing filter in daylight even with my best lenses. The detail and saturation more than makes up for the imperceptible loss of subjective image quality. Charlie L. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM Flash stuff, Charles Loeven |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] filters, again., PCACala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: english (US) terminology/phrase? was Re: [OM] Problems with Olympus America, Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] filters, again., PCACala |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |