Wayne, I agree. Adversity brings out the best in people. I always speak (in
front of an audience) on any subject if I have not had time to prepare it, or
someone has put another restriction on my time etc... well no-one has complained
at least ;-)
Anyway, the original question seems to have been: may George "tart" it up a bit
if he sees a problem? Seems OK to me.
Follow-on question (inferred by some): can we manipulate the image? Seems to
defeat the object of idea of ADITL...
Chris
~~ ><>
Chris Barker
Mailto: cmib@xxxxxxxxxxx & mailto: cmib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------
>From: "Harridge, Wayne" <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [OM] Critique and ADITL
>Date: 14 Oct 1999 14:25
>
> Following this thread, but responding to nobody in particular, I would like
> to make the following comment:
>
> Most people might think that adding restrictions to an activity (don't
> add/subtract anything from the scanned image, keep off the grass, etc.)
> reduces the opportunity for creativity, however I feel the opposite is true.
> The more restrictions that are added, the more creative people will be in
> subverting these restrictions, e.g. look at some of the creative schemes
> that people came up with for escaping from POW camps during WW2. I'm happy
> to go with the majority on this one, however I do not feel that George
> should make any change to the image as submitted by the maker, even
> adjustments to brightness or contrast.
>
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|