Olaf wrote:
>but completely removing/adding bits is a different story
>as that significantly enhances/changes the resulting picture...
>
>What's the list's opinion on this? Do we allow such manipulation, or don't
>we?
The first picture I had in mind for ADITL2 had an object in it that demanded
cloning out and I did it in the normal course of scanning, straightening up,
etc., but later I didn't feel happy about the 'deception' and I chose
another picture instead that needed no more than a touch of sharpening up to
offset the loss in scanning.
I'm not sure about imposing rules but I know I wouldn't have felt happy
about sending in the first one -- though I have no hesitation whatever in
digitally improving pictures for my own use. Perhaps we could have
Manipulated Images as a subject for a future ADITL?
Regards,
Keith Berry (Birmingham, England)
keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
http://homepages.which.net/~k.berry
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|