The only OM lens that I have ever seen get a poor rating in a test was the
200/4 (In a British magazine some years ago).
Let's hear what you think of it.
Lars Bundesen
----------
> Fra: John Hudson <jahudson@xxxxxxxxx>
> Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Emne: Re: [OM] New List Member Introduction
> Dato: 2. september 1999 21:57
>
> At 11:04 AM 02-09-99 -0700, "Boven, Mike" <MBoven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> >Hello OM fans! My name is Mike Veglia and I stumbled upon this here list
> >yesterday and couldn't resist joining up. I do primarily motor sports
> >(read auto racing) photograpy and have been an OM loyalist ever since I
> >bought my first OM1 back in the mid-70s (which I still have and
> >occasionally use). I bought an OM2S in 1985 that has served me well for
> >thousands of rolls to date. Lenses I shoot with mostly include a Tamron
> >SP 60-300 and the Zuiko 200 f4. I look forwards to sharing enthusiasm of
> >things OM and photographic with you all...no doubt questions will come
> >forth soon!
>
> .....a pro doing lots of rolls with a 200 / f4. Now that has got my
> attention! Welcome to the list Mike.
>
> jh
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|