Subject: | Re: Re:Re: [OM] Aerial Photography |
---|---|
From: | "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 1999 02:31:34 +0000 |
At 04:21 8/16/99 , Paul wrote: >>>>Movement of the camera that's not rotation around the film plane is >irrelevant for pictures at infinity.<<< Huh? Also . . . what about UV levels for B&W and color films (don't think its relevant for IR film [??]). Haven't seen any mention of it in the thread. I haven't done any aerial work but what I've read about filters talks about higher levels of UV in aerial work. Is this true and is there anything special required beyond a standard UV filter? -- John < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] XA f stop, epozar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] XA f stop, Hans van Veluwen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re:Re: [OM] Aerial Photography, Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Aerial Photography, flzhgn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |