On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, [ISO-8859-1] Ángel Lobo wrote:
>
> >I´m asking about our good and old friend 200 f4:
> >Why the P. Farrar page says that "There may be two optical versions of
this
> >lens"?
> >Thanks.
> >Ángel Lobo
> >CUENCA (Spain)
> MC and SC perhaps, both of which have been mentioned by posters here.
> /Acer Victoria
Thanks Acer Victoria, but I think that this is not the reason.
Note that this explanation (4) is on the elements/groups, and some others
lenses on the OM System are with single coated and multi coated versions
and don´t have this explanation (4). For instance, his little brother 200 f
5 have the two versions (MC & SC) and don´t have (4).
On all my books and brochures the 200 f 4 have 5 elements / 4 groups.
Anybody knows a different configuration on this lens ?
Paul Farrar, where borns the suspicion of the two optical versions of this
lens ?
Thanks.
Ángel Lobo
CUENCA (Spain)
angel.lobo@xxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|