Subject: | [OM] Re: Reasons *not* to drop your Oly |
---|---|
From: | Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 1999 16:50:41 -0600 |
>Any ideas as to what the teminal velocity might have been of the camera? Since I have to work with falling things all the time for my job and am mathmatically challenged, I sort of commissioned this useful web site to figure such things: http://www.angio.net/personal/climb/speed Note air resistance is not accounted for. Clydeorama Photo Gallery http://home.rmi.net/~csoles/index.htm < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Has anyone tried tele extenders for IS series?, Per Nordenberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-1 meter calibration---how easy, how to do?, *- DORIS FANG -* |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reasons *not* to drop your Oly; was: most durable camera discussion,..., Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reasons *not* to drop your Oly; was: most durable camera discussion,..., Gary Edwards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |