>
> Years ago I saw in a story about the Leica Museum, a picture of a
>Leicaflex SL that had been ripped by the wind from the hands of a
>photographer who had to eject from a military jet flying over 20,000 feet
>high. The camera fell into the desert and was later found by some hikers who
>took the camera to a camera store nearby. While the camera did not function,
>it was intact - the camera store owner removed the film from the camera,
>processed it, and was able to determine from the photos who the camera
>belonged to.
> The photographer sent the camera to Leica who determined that it was
>repairable...however, they gave the photographer a new Leica so they could
>put that one in their museum.
> Strong cameras, those SL's :)
I've seen that same image. I think Leica used it in their advertising...
No doubt many of the scientists on the list will confirm what I am about to
say, but in much more concrete scientific terms...
A falling object can only fall so fast, irrespective of the height from which
it falls. Therefore, IMHO, a camera dropped from say five feet onto concrete,
may actually incur higher g-forces than a camera dropped from 20,000 feet into
soft sand.
Since we have a number of pilots on the list, maybe we can do a more scientific
test. Ken Norton will drop his F5, I'll drop my Contax Aria, and I know we have
a few Leica M owners. :-)
________________________________
Regards,
Denton Taylor
Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com.
Panoramas and Immersive Imaging at
www.threehundredsixty.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|