Gary Reese wrote:
>Mike H. writes:
<< I don't know if you've addressed this before, as I'm new to the list, but
can
you explain why the OM-1 shutter has affected some of your lens tests in the
wide apertures only? Why don't they affect the results across the whole
aperture range? >>
>Perhaps there is a jolt that occurs when the camera's auto aperture linkage
>meets the lens rear diaphragm linkage and it can't travel anywhere because the
>lens is set at full aperture. Likewise, the action might be dampened the
>further the linkage travels (i.e., the more the lens is stopped down).
I have tried to test the effects of the aperture mechanism on the sharpness of
pictures by pushing in the preview button with my finger. I could not reduce a
fuzziness that way in the frames, but I did experience a jolt on my finger when
the shutter is released. I would say that the jolt is real. I don't remember
whether the jolt was bigger at the wide-open aperture.
>At wider apertures, the shutter speed is faster. Perhaps during the time the
>film is being exposed there are stronger and/or more cycles of residual
>harmonic vibrations at, say 1/250th sec. (= f/2.8), versus 1/8th (= f/16).
Gary, do you have a record of actual shutter speeds you used for those wider
apertures?
Now that you can use the higher shutter speeds with the OM2000 or the OM-4,
would you increase the light level on your map?
Tomoko Yamamoto
mailto:tomokoy@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.charm.net/~tomokoy/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|