Subject: | Re: 4-Ti prices - was:Re: [OM] 2 or 4? |
---|---|
From: | Gary Edwards <edwardsg@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 1999 20:58:23 -0500 |
Sounds good. Hey John H! If my 85/2 doesn't tighten up OK just scrimp on the packing peanuts and insure it for the price of a new 85 when you send it back to me. You are going to send my baby back, aren't you? ;-) Gary Edwards Gregg Iverson wrote: > I can't top the $50 4T but my used 4 was lost by UPS and replaced with > a new 4T. I only lost my favorite focusing screen in the process. > > Gregg > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] A 50mm Note, Gary Edwards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1050, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 4-Ti prices - was:Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Gregg Iverson |
Next by Thread: | Re: 4-Ti prices - was:Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, John Hermanson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |