Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM bodies, OTF exp. and pinholes

Subject: Re: [OM] OM bodies, OTF exp. and pinholes
From: Terry Mair <tmair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 21:12:57 -0600
Oh...I don't know!!!!
Terry

Tom Trottier wrote:

> I'd avoid slit canyons.
>
> Tom
>
> -- Original Message ---
> From:                   "Red_Rover" <Red_Rover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject:                [OM] OM bodies, OTF exp. and pinholes
> Date sent:              Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:29:18 -0700
>
> > My interest in using a pinhole on my OM-10 has been piqued by the recent
> > discussions here on the subject. Would the OTF take care of exposure time,
> > or are the light levels too low for this? I've relied on OTF to take care
> > of things when using my 50 1.8 reversed, just thought maybe that would
> > work here too. Frank Costa Red_Rover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ------------------
> From: Tom Trottier, President, ACT Productions Inc.
> infoanim@xxxxxx                   http://www.act.ca
> +1 613 594-4829                 fax +1 613 594-8944
> 199 Holmwood Ave,  Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1S 2P3
> "Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz