Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200/4

Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4
From: Pauls0627@xxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:48:54 EDT
In a message dated 7/16/99 8:53:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
visigoth@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> Hi all!  Just traded an old N*kk*r 105/2.5 for a near mint Zuiko 200/4.  I
>  *think* I see a hint of green in the coating, but it doesn't say MC.
>  (Serial number 260*** -- anyone know if this is multi-coated?)

Based on the MC/SC list, and your hint of green, this lens is MC.

>  
>  I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding this lens, or whether there
>  even is one.  The tests seem all over the map.  Some seem to think it's a
>  great lens, even hand-held; Mr. Reese seems to have decided you have to
>  nail it down to a support to really get decent results.  (Although the new
>  test results are pretty impressive, it seems; holds its own with the
>  180, at some apertures.)

I love the lens. I get sharp results outdoors handheld, but I try to keep the 
shutter speed at 1/500 or 1/1000. If you are going to use this lens handheld, 
even outdoors, fast film is essential.

>  
>  And what about the 2xA converter?  Someone in the archives suggested you
>  could *hand-hold* it with the converter attached!  That would be
>  something:  a 400mm lens that didn't require a tripod...

I have the 2X-A  as well. Works great with the 200/4. Never tried it handheld 
though.

Paul Schings
Coventry, Rhode Island USA

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz