Thanks for all the feedback. For now, I'm keeping them
both (along with my Sunpak 422D). They all have their
high (and low) points.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 11:50 AM
Subject: [OM] F280 vs T32
>>From: "M. Stephens" <mike1964@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>I have recently acquired an OM4T and F280 flash :-)
>>I have a T32. Can anyone provide a comparison of the
>>two? I'm trying to decide which to keep and which to
>>sell...
>
>They're like apples and oranges. If you can afford it, keep them both!
>
>T32:
>* more powerful
>* can use multiple T-series flashes with TTL exposure
>* accepts external power
>* automatically sets camera to 1/60th (except OM-2 and manuals)
>* no better than a manual flash for fill
>
>F280
>* use at any shutter speed
>* simple to use for fill
>* guide number goes way down at high shutter speeds
>* cannot use multiple flashes in auto mode
>* does not accept external power
>
>In short, the F280 is sort of a "one trick pony." I feel the T32 is
>more versatile, but my bias is toward studio lighting. If you only
>use a flash on-camera, and never expect to use more than one, the
>F280 might be better for you.
>
>
>: Jan Steinman <mailto:jans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>: 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068-1331 USA
>: +1.503.635.3229
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|