Thanks Warren
It is different with each of the three bodies, and depending on which
lens I have in the eyecup (or my spectacles instead). I certainly would
not have noticed it with only a matte screen in the viewfinder.
Chris
~~~~~ WKato@xxxxxxx said:
>In a message dated 99-07-12 08:54:55 EDT, you write:
>
>> OM query for someone more knowledgeable than I: if the split
>> screen/microprism focussing aid will not go to infinity by a slight
>> amount, should I keep or send back the little 21/3.5 that I have just
>> bought? I should be grateful for an opinion, and I hope that this wasn't
>> discussed ad nauseam while I was away (MC 50/1.8s anyone ;-))
>>
>I wouldn't profess to be more knowledgeable but my 21/3.5 won't focus to
>infinity with my OM10 but focuses past infinity with the OM3. It's one of
>my
>favorite lens. There shouldn't be an infinity focus problem because even
>wide
>open everything should be in focus from 3 meters onward to infinity. I think
>that your "problem" might be a function of the camera body than the lens.
>
>Warren
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
><> *** Chris Barker ***
mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|