At 19:11 +0200 on 12.06.99, ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
> a member or not. But don't you all see a recent pattern here, where some of
> us are being forced out? Also- IMO, if critiques of the ADITL photos are
> given on-list, it will definitely be the death of the list, no doubt
>about it.
At 20:37 +0200 on 12.06.99, Pauls0627@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I'm probably going to regret this, but... If everyone agrees I will
>volunteer
> to be the "drop point" for the critiques. I'll group them together and send
> out a single consolidated set of critiques for each picture submitted. I
>will
> then post these to the list. There will be somewhat slower turn-around, but
> it should make the list a little easier to digest every day (pun intended).
I quite agree on that subject, though I've never thought about it until
now! Wouldn't it be possible to make a "separate" list for the critiques? I
was once a member of a list that generated an opt-in list (for book
reviews), that members could join or not, as they wished.
I have no idea if this is feasible with the listserver; but it would be an
idea to not be flooded with even more mails. I'm still on 3300 non-read
mails....
*sigh*
siri.
po box 9024 gronland, n-0133 oslo mailto:sbjoner@xxxxxxxxx fone: +47 9010
4635 fax: +47 9030 6420
"argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours" ... r. bach
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|