On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Charles Loeven wrote:
>Acer said,
>
><<If done w/o cl, you're still shooting for the clearest and sharpest image.
>I don't see how it would make any difference. FWIW, I have shot a few
>rolls w/o my specs, and they were fine. Now I shoot with specs simply
>because I got new ones (multicoated! whoohhooo! green!) and don't want to
>further lose my eyesight (old specs, since '92, were L/R -.5/-1.0; current
>setup is two steps stronger as of last month).>>
>
>My question is, as long as the split screen is aligned or the micro prism
>is microed (or what ever you call it) isn't that the point of focus with or
>without
>diopter correction?
Which is what I was saying; how would wearing corrective lenses change
this?
/Acer "Siddiq" Victoria
--
http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01/eyespy.jpg <---"Siddiq, you are
/BIZARRE/!" --Tom
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
