" >We don't have to have our names posted by the photos at all. Only
" >technical info, if even that. All that matter--and should matter--is the
" >actual photo. If one person keeps winning, so be it. No hold barred, and
" >may the best photo win.
" >
"
" I have to diasgree. Keep them anonymous till the voting's over, but then
" publish the name. What's the point of winning if no one knows who you are?
Sorry, just had to jump in here...
In reply to the question, "What's the point of winning if no one knows
who you are," I would like to ask, what's the point of winning?
It seems to me to be more interesting to choose a theme (or not) and
have people send in contributions which people can comment on. Voting
is like a democracy...is art a democratic process?
I like the idea of a periodic collection of photos...but making it a
contest seems unnecessary.
My zwei pfennig,
--
Sean Mattingly | What is, is
---------------------- | What is not is possible
matting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Only what is not is possible
http://www-zeus.desy.de/~matting/ | -Einstuerzende Neubauten
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|