Subject: | [OM] Re: Shroedinger's Film |
---|---|
From: | lclark@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 08 May 1999 16:05:13 -0400 |
In <v04011704b35a0e4853b5@[206.163.82.211]>, on 05/08/99 at 08:56 AM, Jan Steinman <jans@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: >(By the way, what does unexposed film look like? :-) Opaque. Definitely. [I just looked.] Away with these philosophic conundrums. Thank you, Mr. James. les clark ----------------------------------------------------------- lclark@xxxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------------------------------- < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Acer Victoria |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] The tyranny of flunkies, lclark |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | [OM] RE:Single system? (long), aclaudiomolinari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |