Subject: | Re: Re: Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4) |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <jans@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 8 May 1999 08:56:52 -0700 |
>From: GAPiccagli@xxxxxxx >... the act of observing, including the >instrumentation used, affects and even alters what is observed. Ah! Now we're on to Schroedinger's cat! Photographers, of all people, have known this for 150 years! (By the way, what does unexposed film look like? :-) : Jan Steinman <mailto:jans@xxxxxxxxxxx> : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068-1331 USA : +1.503.635.3229 < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 300mm f4.5 multicoated examples: reflect green?, Jan Steinman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #900, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Barry B. Bean |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Acer Victoria |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |