At 11:02 AM 5/5/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 12:24 AM 5/5/99 -0500, Joel wrote:
>>I'm not sure what to think about the OM-1 now. To get some perspective, I
>>tried the same test with my FM2 and 80-200/f4. Solid as rock on tripod
>>alone. So I thought "Maybe my OM-1 MD is a rotten egg; I'll try the
>>OM-1n."
>Perhaps this is the difference between mechanical controlled and
>electronic controlled shutter. I wonder if there is a difference
>between an OM-3 and OM-4?
>
>Wayne
>
Which was why I also tested the Nikon FM2 -- because of the mechanical
shutter.
I think Richard Schaetzl used the OM-4 and found that it was solid. Yes,
it would be interesting to know how the OM-3 might fare.
Joel
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|