Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4) |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Shumaker <shumaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 05 May 1999 11:02:06 -0400 |
At 12:24 AM 5/5/99 -0500, Joel wrote: >I'm not sure what to think about the OM-1 now. To get some perspective, I >tried the same test with my FM2 and 80-200/f4. Solid as rock on tripod >alone. So I thought "Maybe my OM-1 MD is a rotten egg; I'll try the >OM-1n." Perhaps this is the difference between mechanical controlled and electronic controlled shutter. I wonder if there is a difference between an OM-3 and OM-4? Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Customs Duties-Another question, Arnab Kumar Banerjee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] 1999 Ballerina of Prose Award, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |