Subject: | Re: [OM] A T20 Question |
---|---|
From: | Christopher Biggs <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 30 Apr 1999 15:25:16 +1000 |
Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly: > > I'm glad I got one with "feet." I hate to seem like a metrophobe, but feet > are more useful units of measurement in working out manual flash values: > neither too many nor too few. Your kilometers may vary. Absolutely. I'm similarly glad that I got the one with metres. I can't do feet (eg. "fifty feet" is a meaningless figure until I multiply by 3/10 and think "fifteen metres"). cjb. -- __ / \ / \ /MORONS\ / \ \ next / \ 15 / \msgs/ \__/ || || ||chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx One more infobahn cliche couldn't hurt... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] olympus docs question, Acer Victoria |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Latest lens tests, PCACala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A T20 Question, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A T20 Question, Charles Loeven |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |