>>I've heard that the OM2s are not reliable and that the OM2(n) are getting
>>too old...
Oh, the dilemma of the bodies....
The OM-2S is a camera that utilizes similar electronics and body componants
with the original OM-4. Both are from the same time period and both suffer
from *slightly* increased battery drain. The problem with the OM-2S is
that its profit margin was much slimmer than the more costly OM-4. The
sales of the OM-4, which incorporated multi-spot metering instead of the
program mode in the OM-2S proved to be successful enough for Olympus to end
the decade of dominance by the OM-2 series.
>From a pure usability point of view, the OM-2S is arguably the best OM
made. It is extremely simple to use with the most complex thing to operate
is the Program-Auto-Manual switch. There is no On-Off switch as that is
automatic with just a touch of the shutter release. The program mode
works! I know that it is heresy to say that you park your brains and let
the camera do the work, but that is exactly what it does. Just focus and
shoot.
Is the OM-2S unreliable? What camera isn't? Every model from every brand
will suffer a type of failure particular to its construction, design or
usage. The situation with the OM-2S is that a failure of the main circuit
board is considered unrepairable. The mechanics of the camera are sound
and show no greater or lessor failure rate than any OM body. Chances are,
if you have an OM-2S that does not have any electronic problems by now, it
may never have any. The only exception, I know of are the ISO dial
resister contacts, which the OM-2md and OM-2n models also suffer problems
with. The only mechanical failure I've ever had was with an OM-1, not an
OM-2S.
Is the OM-2S a battery hog? Compared to what? A solar powered calculator?
Get real! The OM-2S and OM-4 (original, not the T or Ti models), suffer
from a slight increase in battery drain during non-operation. In 1998 I
went through four sets of batteries in the OM-2S, 5 or 6 sets in the IS-3,
and one mercury cell in the OM-1. I also went through probably 60 AA
batteries in the flashes and winders and killed a few nicads along the way.
Compare the cost of the silver-oxide button cells that go in the OM-2S
with the Lithium blobs that go in "modern" cameras. Compare the lifespan.
The IS-3 is supposed to average 480 exposures per set of batteries. Upon
looking back at this past year, I don't come anywhere near that!
It is true that flash usage on an OM-2S will drain the batteries in a
hurry. If the flash-ready light is green inside the viewfinder, it is
powered by the camera's batteries. If it is red, it is powered by the
flash's batteries. The green viewfinder LED will toast a set of batteries
in a real hurry! For a tiny fee, Camtech will replace this circuit during
a normal CLA.
Is the age of an OM-2n or OM-2md a problem? Look at it this way--they are
younger than many airliners you fly in. Keep them maintained and cleaned
and they will function indefinitely.
My recommendation is to locate a brassed but well maintained OM-2S. Closet
Queens are probably to be avoided. I've used mine extensively since I
bought it almost new. The previous owner bought it brand new, lost his job
two weeks later and traded it all back in. I bought it several days later.
With the exception of the ISO dial requiring occasional cleaning and
lubing, it has performed flawlessly for going on 14 years now. I had the
flash ready light circuit changed as I do a lot of flash work (weddings,
portraits, events, etc) and it really makes a big difference. I think what
many people attribute to the slow at-rest drain is really caused by the
flash ready light.
My OM-2S has over 30,000 exposures under its belt and is working better
than ever. I've upgraded the screen to the 2-4 screen which makes all the
difference in the world. I use it as my primary camera body with the
OM-1md as the backup or for nocturnal and winter use.
Last year I sold an OM-2md that I rarely used. It did with a mechanical
needle what the 2S does with LCDs. The LCD presentation proved, to me, to
be the far better visual representation of exposure data. Besides, battery
drain on that camera was horrific as I was constantly forgetting to turn
the thing off.
All OM-2 models are fine cameras and if they are currently in good
condition, will remain that way with periodic CLA (clean, lube, adjust).
Ken
Kenneth E. Norton
Image66 Photography
image66@xxxxxxx
(515) 791-2306
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|