> I have a newly acquired OM4 (new to me) and only have a T-20 flash. I'd
> like to have a flash that cycles faster and one that I could easily get "off
> the camera" to avoid red-eye when photographing my new baby girl. The T20
> adapter and TTL cable (to accomplish "off the camera) look as expensive as a
> used T-32. The T-45 looks impressive but is bulky and I don't know if
> battery/charger supplies are still supported by Olympus. The F-280 is new
> and would support higher sync speeds if I ever get an OM-4T but it's
> obviously not a beefy or strong as the T-45.
>
> Does anyone have some top-level working advise on what my best option would
> be for one general purpose better Olympus flash (quicker cycling, off-camera
> cable, maybe growth towards OM-4T possible) ?
I own a T-45 and an F280. They both work fine, but I'm not sure I would
recommend either to you. For "photographing babies" around the house,
my choice would be the T-45 - but I already have a working battery and
charger. It's probably not the right system to buy into right now. I
have an OM-1 body with a dead meter that lives on the T-45, making it
the llargets and most expensive Instamatic extant. I've been using the
F280 shoe mounted on an OM-3Ti - but the F280 clearly isn't optimal for
you.
I recommend the system that I have on my current "buy when it appears
cheap enough" list. A T-32 mounted on a Power Bounce Grip 2. All the
weight and flexibility of the T-45, and no worries about the battery or
charger. Plus, a handy shoe-mounted flash for the occasions where that
works.
--
Kenneth Sloan sloan@xxxxxxx
Computer and Information Sciences (205) 934-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX (205) 934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/sloan/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|