At 11:40 PM 3/22/99 -0000, you wrote:
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joel Wilcox
>Subject: [OM] Q: Remote Cord and vibration
>
>
>>...I have tended always to use a cable release even with a winder, fearing
>>that the winder's mechanism to trip the shutter might introduce more
>>vibration during slow, tripod-mounted exposures than a traditional cable
>>release.
>
>
>This is interesting as I've always felt the opposite. Modern cable releases
>are much less floppy than the old fabric type and I've thought that my home
>made remote for the Winder 2 which has a microswitch on the end, imparts no
>movement to the lead to be passed on to the camera. On the other hand, I
>feel that the addition of the Winder moves the camera away from the tripod
>screw and adds increased whippiness to the whole assembly and prefer to
>remove it for tripod use.
>
>Regards,
>Keith
>keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Hi Keith,
Yes, I find your experiences interesting as well. The background to my
question is that a couple months ago I was shooting OM-2S and 200/f4 with
2X-A, all mounted on a long lens support bracket made by Bogen. Tripod was
low to the ground and center post down. Because of the low vantage point I
was kneeling and of course trying not to touch the tripod. I was holding
my 12" cable release (a very good one BTW), waiting for my shots, when I
started to feel a tiny bit of fatigue in my arm. Simple movements of the
cable release in my hand I felt could introduce movement in a setup like
that. I wasn't using a winder but wished I was because then I could use
the 5 m M.Remote Cord with its long, limp, light cord. At least I know
with the latter I wouldn't introduce any movement to the camera through the
shutter release itself. Now if I just knew for sure that the winder
doesn't introduce any movement ...
Joel
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|