Marco;
It'll be interesting to know how well this works.
George
Marco Tomat wrote:
>
> I think it is lighter than it seems. I am going to know myself because I am
> buying one. No, I have no IS-3, I intend to use it as an aperture-saving
> tele-converter on my 55mm (or less) tele lenses.
>
> Marco
>
>
> > They did complain, however, about the 'clunkiness' of putting it (the 300
> > mm converter)
> > on/off. I don't have one, but when I look at the photo of the IS-3 with
> > one mounted I wonder: 1) How the internal lens mechanics can hold up to
> > this extra weight on the end and 2) whether you could use it on a tripod
> > without supporting the end of the lens.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|