I think it is lighter than it seems. I am going to know myself because I am
buying one. No, I have no IS-3, I intend to use it as an aperture-saving
tele-converter on my 55mm (or less) tele lenses.
Marco
----------
>Da: "George M." <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>A: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Oggetto: Re: [OM] IS-3 lens test.
>Data: Mar, 16 mar 1999 17:50
>
> They did complain, however, about the 'clunkiness' of putting it
> on/off. I don't have one, but when I look at the photo of the IS-3 with
> one mounted I wonder: 1) How the internal lens mechanics can hold up to
> this extra weight on the end and 2) whether you could use it on a tripod
> without supporting the end of the lens.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|