>While one would ideally spend a large wodge on this, it may not be possible.
>If a Zuiko 300/4.5 is still beyond your reach, you may have to settle for
>something like the Sigma APO 400/5.6. While some people have not exactly
>eulogised over it, I have one, and think it gives satisfactory performance
>*for its price*. In other words, it may not be the best lens around, but
>the results aren't truly disgraceful.
>
>Simon E.
Hi Simon and Ulf,
I don't want to be didactic with my comments on the Sigma lens. It's just
my personal opinion. Maybe there are better specimen around than the two
(!) new ones I have tried. There were also some good tests, maybe the
series started good and got worse with the increase of the serial numbers.
Matthias
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|