I found the following comment in the Nature Photography section of photo.net,
Bob Atkins runs the Nature Photography areas and offers this opinion of the OM
system:
"I know Olympus made some good macro optics for example, and OM1 bodies are
not too expensive. The trouble with Olympus is that they never made good,
cheap, long telephotos."
Is this generally thought to be a correct statement? Should we look elsewhere
for reasonably priced long lenses? What are the alternatives?
Cheers,
Kerry Frohling
Fullerton, CA, USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|