At 05:51 PM 2/26/99 +0100, you wrote:
>c.e. packard wrote:
>
>:I may be way out of line here, I do not have the technical expertise or
>:knowledge of the OM system that others on the list have, but I find the
>:above statement rather "dismal?" "detracting?" and/or "offensive".
>:The 707 and 101 may have been (failures?) in Olympus's development
>:history and the OM-2000 is being manufactured by Cosina and not by
>:Olympus, however they are a part of the OM system!
>
>Hey! I didn't start this "fight"! Olympus did, and they did it twice.
Hans et al.:
We've been through the anguish of whether the OM-2000 is "true Oly" or not.
Please read the archives and see if there is really anything new to be
added on this topic. It doesn't fill a void but it is not worthless. If
it had mirror lockup, I personally would buy one. I may still buy one.
Beats P&S.
Joel
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|