On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> However the 21 and 24/2.8 are very
> close, but the disappointment is the 24/2, that never really seems to
> get as crisp as its smaller aperture brethren.
I know the tests prove the 24/2.0 to be a fine performer, but the
24/2.8 seems at least equally good if not better to me. YMMV.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|