Mikael wrote
>I did the same mistake several years ago and traded the 24:2.8 for a
>21:3.5. The 21:3.5 is great for pictures of e.g. birdnests or plants, if
>you also want to include the environment, but otherwise it is not nearly
>as usable as the 24:2.8. The quality of the transparencies differ also;
>I got clearer and crisper pictures with the 24:2.8 and the enges were
>sharper.
Interesting - my (again subjective) experience is that the 21/3.5 is
sharper than the 24/2.8. My 21 is subjectively one of the sharpest Zuikos
I have.
Regards
Richard
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|