In <l03102800b2e658c14761@[134.147.1.61]>, on 02/09/99 at 11:33 PM,
Matthias Wilke <Matthias.K.Wilke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>Jan wrote:
>>No, it would be terrible. This lens is for one specific purpose only, and
>>furthermore, you have to be a licensed architect to legally use it. Other
>>things it is useless for: trees, waterfalls, tiny, long things (with
>>extension tubes). In short, it will be totally useless for any long object
>>EXCEPT a boring building.
>This isn't true, a shift lens is also interesting for trees
>respectively the forest. The use of a shift lens in a canyon may be not
>very effective, if there are no known patterns, but I think it would
>not be terrible.
>Matthias
If something seems outrageous, it probably is.
If it doesn't, it also probably is...
[Shaking off my Da-Da license.]
les clark
-----------------------------------------------------------
lclark@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|