Jan wrote:
>No, it would be terrible. This lens is for one specific purpose only, and
>furthermore, you have to be a licensed architect to legally use it. Other
>things it is useless for: trees, waterfalls, tiny, long things (with
>extension tubes). In short, it will be totally useless for any long object
>EXCEPT a boring building.
This isn't true, a shift lens is also interesting for trees respectively
the forest. The use of a shift lens in a canyon may be not very effective,
if there are no known patterns, but I think it would not be terrible.
Matthias
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|