ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM telephotos.

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM telephotos.
From:	Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:40:50 -0700

>The 300mm f/4.5 w/ 2x
>at f/4.5 (f/9 effective) and f/5.6 (f/11 effective) are probably also an F.

I'd agree with that. I found poor critical sharpness and very low contrast
when I tried that combo. Ended up selling both the lens and 2x but now wish
I'd kept the former (that 350's a monster), no regrets about the latter.

Clyde Soles Photo Gallery
http://home.rmi.net/~csoles/Mainpage.htm

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OM telephotos., (continued) Re: [OM] OM telephotos., gma RE: [OM] OM telephotos., Angel Lobo Caballero RE: [OM] OM telephotos., Joel Wilcox RE: [OM] OM telephotos., lclark Re: [OM] OM telephotos., PCACala Re: [OM] OM telephotos., PCACala Re: [OM] OM telephotos., PCACala Re: [OM] OM telephotos., KenK1ZYW Re: [OM] OM telephotos., PCACala Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Clyde Soles <= Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Giles Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Ulf Westerberg Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] OM telephotos., CHAMOTUR Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Ulf Westerberg

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Darn!, Clyde Soles
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OM-2n shutter speeds - retest, John Hermanson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Joel Wilcox
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM telephotos., Giles
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]