The IS-2 focus's almost as slowly as the IS-1, and at times it may be so
maddening you might consider smashing it. Well, maybe not.
John
marc simon wrote:
>
> Hi Brad,
> you wrote:
> >>As for the IS series, I think Ken pretty much covered it.
>
> I agree with you the post of Ken is a good one (I'm still waiting for the
> end of the story of Vert and Toky...) and the IS-3000 is a very good "all
> rounder".
>
> >>We currently have a used IS-2 at the store I'm considering buying (do I
> really NEED 8 cameras? ;)).
>
> I don't know if you need one more but when closed the IS-2 is so small that
> you could put it in a jacket pocket (a large one) and so always have it with
> you. If my memory is right I guess that Gary Reese have replaced his P&S by
> an IS-2. You are right about the speed of the zoom and there is also a
> little limitation with the accuracy of the autofocus: I've missed some
> pictures because I couldn't do the focusing just in time...
> Anyway it's a nice tool
> regards
> marc
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|