> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Petrush [SMTP:petrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 1:35 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot
>
> Since about December 15, 1791. A little piece of paper commonly refered
> to
> as "The Bill of Rights". To refresh your memory:
>
> Amendment I.
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
> prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
> or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
> petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
>
> You may not agree, and that too is your right. But whether you agree or
> not
> is utterly irrelevant; the person has the right.
>
Not that I disagree in principle, but surely this only applies to
the U.S.A., not an international forum such as we have here. I must check
the Australian constitution to see if Frank really was entitled to make
those statements while on Australian soil !
...Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|