Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot

Subject: Re: [OM] "entitled" to an opinion?; multi-spot
From: "John Petrush" <petrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:34:54 -0800
Since about December 15, 1791.  A little piece of paper commonly refered to
as "The Bill of Rights".  To refresh your memory:

Amendment I.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You may not agree, and that too is your right.  But whether you agree or not
is utterly irrelevant; the person has the right.

John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far"

 William Sommerwerck <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


>"Can't someone express their dissatisfaction with an Olympus product
>around here? I do think he was pushing it a bit suggesting that these
>features were what lost Olympus its SLR market, however he's entitled to
>his opinion."
>
>I really hate the old saw that "everyone is entitled to their opinion."
>Since when?




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz