Subject: | Re: [OM] Is the OM system dead? |
---|---|
From: | "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:53:07 -0800 |
Ken Norton Wrote, <<Since I'm up to my eyeballs in Wonderbrick research>> And I must say, your research has been a very educational experience for me. Thanks for another well done analysis on the current state of high end photo equipment. Charles Loeven cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Thoughts on recommending against the OM2000, ClassicVW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] First semi-serious astrophotography attempt, John Gettis |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] IS-10 exposure accuracy; OM popularity; wonder bricks, et al., William Sommerwerck |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is the OM system dead?, PCACala |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |