At 07:26 PM 12/11/98 -0800, John Petrush wrote:
>For me, the OM-1(n). One, I can afford one :-) More importantly, since
>the -1(n) operates sans batteries, I can shoot in harsher conditions,
>there's less to go wrong or break, and as long as 35mm film is available, I
>can make pictures. Nice and simple.
I'm wondering: What about the OM-2000? It has many of the attributes of
the OM-1(n), and includes a choice between manual center-weighted and spot
metering. It's also new, and relatively inexpensive. Parts may be around
for a while. Flash synch at up to 1/125th. Takes our beloved Zuikos.
----
: -----==3== --- ---
- Peter - : | | | | | | | |
: @| @| @| @| @| @| @| @|
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|