Peter A. Klein wrote:
> To which, I remark:
> There are two major issues here:
>
> 1. Is an f/2.8 wide angle lens better optical quality than a f/2?
> 2. Is a 28 a reasonable substitute for a 35 and a 24?
>
> This interests me, too, as the next lens I get may be a wide-angle. My
> current outfit is 35/2.8, 50/1.4 and 100/2.8. I'm inclined toward a 24
> rather than a 28. More on that in a moment.
An 24mm might be a better addition to an 35mm lens than an 28mm.
Regards
Richard
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|