I have one that I've had for about 15 years, I've been very pleased with
its performance. Bright, as you would expect, and sharp. very good with
close work as well a portraits.
Steve Roman, Champlin, MN
decke003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: The Searcher <hopi@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, October 19, 1998 7:34 PM
Subject: [OM] Comments on 85/2.0 requested
>Hi.
>
>Thanks for reading my post.
>
>I've been shopping for a medium OM tele and I thought I should just forget
>about the wonderful 100/2.0 'cause it's just so spendy. However, do any of
>you out there think that the 85/2.0 might be a smart substitute? Or is fast
>glass ALWAYS expensive ($300+)? What's the current market value of this
>lens? I thought I would sit tight until I could find a 100/2.8, but I
>haven't read too many positive things about it while I've been waiting.
>
>Thanks in advance for any comments regarding the fast 85.
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|