Either camera can bring years of fine service, what makes you happy only you
can decide <g>. To more purposely answer you, the 2n is a terrific camera
and is my workhorse body - I have 2 of them. The advantage of the 4T is
spot metering, in all its variants, and a few little extras like the
exposure compensation buttons, memory, adjustable diopter. The 4T probably
has more years left in it. After I find another mint black 1n, I'll begin
looking for a 4T.
John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
Ben Poels <poelsb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> asked:
>As I said in my last post I am only an intermediate level photographer. For
>years I have used my OM-1MD quite happily. I later bought a used OM-F
>to play around with the auto ability. Sadly the focusing aid LED system
does
>not work. Anyway I find the OM-F to be a bit inferior. Do you think I would
>be
>happy with an OM-2N or should I spend the extra for an OM-4T? I can pick up
>an OM-4T for $575 CDN or about $370 US. It has been well used with lots
>of brassing but everything seems to work. Thanks,
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|