Hi George,
Thanks, and yes, I do plan on some more test.
a. 85-250 vs 135 f 2.8, 180 f2.8 200 f4, & 300 f4.5.
b. Since I was so STUPID, that I did not buy your 250 f2, I guess I'll have to
wait till I get smarter. May be a while!
BW
Ps. Did you change programs? Your response is in at least 20 points.
gma@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< ONLYOLYBW@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi C.H. & Shawn,
> I guess I should jump in here. As you may remember, I did a fairly
detailed
> comparison between the 85 f2 & 85-250 zoom at 85mm @ f8 a few weeks ago.
Thanks, Buddy, good test with interesting results. So 85-250 at 85 is pretty
much
comparable to 85/2 prime. That's one heck of a zoom, then. Maybe I'll try a
similar test with my 65-200 @85 vs my SC 85/2 which has some cleaning
scratches on
the rear element. And maybe at 200 vs my SC 200/5.
Do you plan to take the next step and compare the 85-250 @ 250 vs the 250/2
<G>.
george >>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|