ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Oly OM System

Subject:	Re: [OM] Oly OM System
From:	Denton Taylor <denton@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:13:58 -0400

At 09:12 AM 9/27/98 +0000, you wrote:
>> Wouldn't we like it if Oly introduced even one lousy SLR product a year?
>
>no I wouldn't.  I'd rather they introduced high quality items or none at all.
>
>Simon E.
>
>
Sorry, bad choice of slang....

Wouldn't it be nice if oly introduced even one *%@&$ SLR product a year?

:-)



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Oly OM System, (continued) Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Soenke Jansen Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Richard Schaetzl Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Shawn Wright Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Gary Schloss Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Paul D. Farrar Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Mark Hammons Re: [OM] Oly OM System, lion1 Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Mark Hammons Re: [OM] Oly OM System, sje Re: [OM] Oly OM System, Denton Taylor <= Re: [OM] Oly OM System, John A. Prosper

Previous by Date:	[OM] Tamron 17mm/3.5, wiliam . wagenaar
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: Cost of goods, no OM content, Richard Dale
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oly OM System, sje
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oly OM System, John A. Prosper
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]