Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Extension ring for 1:1?

Subject: Re: [OM] Extension ring for 1:1?
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:59:18 -0700
John Gaasland wrote:
> 
> gma wrote:
> >
> > Pauls0627@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 9/17/98 3:09:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> > > gma@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > writes:
> > >
> > > << Rule of thumb: Length of tube for 1:1 = half the focal length of the
> > >  lens, if the lens goes to 1:2 by itself. Eg for the 50 macros, 25 tube
> > >  does it.  For the 90, 45 mm tube needed. (or 25+14+7) >>
> > >
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that for 1:1 the total extension 
> > > must
> > > equal the focal length. So for the 50mm macros, which have 25mm of 
> > > extension
> > > with the helicoid, you need to add 25mm extension to get 1:1. Using 
> > > George's
> > > other example, then the 90 must have 45mm of helicoid travel (I don't 
> > > know for
> > > sure if it does or not).
> > >
> > > Paul Schings
> > > Coventry, RI
> > >
> >
> > Paul;
> >
> > It does.  It goes to 1:2 on it's own.
> >
> > george
> >
> Thanks all for the extension ring info. So, I think that means I need a
> 25mm for my 50/1.8? Do they make 12 or 13s so you can get 1:2, or put
> the together to get 1:1? Thanks, John.


Whoops, NO. You'll need more like 40 or more for the normal lens.  I was
referring to the 50/3.5 and 50/2 macros, which supply 25mm of extra
extension themselves, using the helicoil. See 'timberwolfs' recent post
for another explanation.
-- 


george  :>)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz