Subject: | Re: [OM] Who "should" own an OM camera? |
---|---|
From: | Steve Pollock <cyberoptix@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Sep 1998 10:19:45 -0700 |
>Someone recently asked which OM camera and lens he should buy on a >budget of $250. This got me to thinking as to why anyone with only $250 >would want to own an OM camera. hmmmm. considering that I bought a fine (ex+) OM2n for $100 and a mint zuiko 50/3.5 macro for $150, I can't imagine who *wouldn't* want an Olympus... 2¢ srp < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OM-1/2 vs OM-4T shutter speed ring, Shawn Wright |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] The Digital Orgy, gma |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Who "should" own an OM camera?, William Sommerwerck |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Who "should" own an OM camera?, John Gaasland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |