Subject: | Re: Human vision (no OM content) (was Re: [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2) |
---|---|
From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:04:35 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Ken Norton wrote: > Does lens vision and human vision haft to match? They can't. Another bit for this discussion... I remember reading (in Camera 35) Ernst Haas saying that he had chosen Leica because, "like the human eye, they're not too sharp". Go figure... *= Doris Fang =* < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] RE : (OM) XA, *- DORIS FANG -* |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Who "should" own an OM camera?, PCACala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Human vision (no OM content) (was Re: [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2), Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: Human vision (no OM content) (was Re: [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2), Oleg Volk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |