>George <gma@xxxxxxxxxx> agonized aloud.......
>
>
>>I'm also thinking of selling my 90
>>macro cause I've now got an 80F/4 and a 50F/2 and I'll keep either the
>>85 or the 100 so I think the 90 will be superflous (Oh, and I need the
>>$$$). Can somebody please talk me out of that one?
>>
>George,
>
>Hang on to the 90 macro, its usefulness is beyond measure. The 80F/4 needs
>extension tubes or bellows to be useful and does not do infinity well. The
>50F/2 (lovely piece of glass, isn't it <g>) is terrific when you can get
>close, but has its limitations in working diatance. The 90 mac steps up to
>extend the working distance range without loss of magnification or lens
>speed. Such a deal! What you *really* need to be doing is hunting down a
>135mm macro and a set of auto-tubes.
>
>John P
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|